By M. McCoubrey
I’ve always been bothered by the apparent conflict between predestination and free will in Christianity. It’s not something that impacts salvation or anything, but it’s one of those things that just nags at me. It seems that in half the sermons I’ve listened to, the takeaway is that God’s plan rules, that His way is always the way, and that He chooses the elect based on His criteria – things sound pretty set. The other half of the sermons revolve around the fact that we are to choose Jesus, that we need to make ourselves one of the elect (thank you Spurgeon), and that our prayers can change outcomes.
I’ve always been bothered by the apparent conflict between predestination and free will in Christianity. It’s not something that impacts salvation or anything, but it’s one of those things that just nags at me. It seems that in half the sermons I’ve listened to, the takeaway is that God’s plan rules, that His way is always the way, and that He chooses the elect based on His criteria – things sound pretty set. The other half of the sermons revolve around the fact that we are to choose Jesus, that we need to make ourselves one of the elect (thank you Spurgeon), and that our prayers can change outcomes.
And the fact is, these differences reflect a duality found
in the Bible. God says that His will is done, Paul talks about God having
selected the elect at the beginning of time, and God says to Pharaoh “For
this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may demonstrate my power in you,
and that my name may be proclaimed in all the earth”. I mean, what chance
does it sound like the guy had? You think that Jonah felt real empowered as a
giant fish swam him to the shore that he was running away from? God and His
will are clearly sovereign.
But then in other passages it is very clear that we have a
choice and that our actions and prayers can actually change outcomes. There’s
the parable of the persistent widow which, while primarily focusing on a
different topic, spells out that prayer can affect change. There’s Paul’s
command to the Philippians that they work out their salvation with fear and
trembling. And then of course there’s John 3:16 “…that whoever believes in Him shall not perish…”
– an open invitation to all, but clearly not all choose to believe. Even back
to the very beginning, Adam and Eve were given a command not to eat the
forbidden fruit, but equally given the freedom to choose to do so.
So what to make of this?
I’ve often heard that the answer is that it’s both - predestination and free will. But not having a clue how that could be, I’ve tended to fall on the side of God’s plan being sovereign and as a result, prayer felt pretty useless. I mean, if God knows everything, and how everything plays out all the way to the end of the world in Revelation and beyond, then what’s the point? And if I look at my motivations honestly, this view gave me an excuse to not be praying and, in the worst cases, a justification for poor behavior.
I’ve often heard that the answer is that it’s both - predestination and free will. But not having a clue how that could be, I’ve tended to fall on the side of God’s plan being sovereign and as a result, prayer felt pretty useless. I mean, if God knows everything, and how everything plays out all the way to the end of the world in Revelation and beyond, then what’s the point? And if I look at my motivations honestly, this view gave me an excuse to not be praying and, in the worst cases, a justification for poor behavior.
But I kept coming back to these verses that seemingly
contradict that view. Why does God so frequently tell us to pray and show us to
pray through Jesus? Why would we be pressed to ‘pray without ceasing’ if it
doesn’t have any effect? And really, who wants to believe that they are a
choiceless cog that has absolutely no input in how their life or faith turns
out? Even if that was what we wanted, it sure doesn’t seem to jive with many
parts of the Bible. I was missing something.
I mentioned the persistent widow parable above in particular
because that happened to be the discussion in our Saturday night group that made something click in my
brain. I tend to think in simplified pictures for difficult topics. It helps me
keep things straight in my simplified brain. And two pictures jumped into my
head that really helped me to understand how God’s plan can be sovereign and
complete while we can somehow still fully retain our free will.
The first involved my kids. There are times that I’m
watching Joe or Ella and I know they are about to do something wrong. I mean, I
don’t have any future telling ability, but I know my kids. I know what tempts
them, I know what drives them, and I know when they are looking to get away
with something. But my knowing that doesn’t mean that the choice is any less
theirs to make. And I’ll often let them complete the disobedience so that I can
use that as a teaching moment, because in the end I’m more concerned about
molding their heart than pre-empting bad behavior. Now since God knows us
infinitely better than I know my kids – of course He would know when I will
mess up and can use that as a chance for discipline. But just like my kids are
making their choices, so I am free to make mine. In other words, just because
He has a perfect understanding of His creation and knows I’m going to sin, that
doesn’t make it any less my choice to actually do it.
But as I processed this, I needed a second picture, because
while that first one does a good job of separating ‘knowing’ from ‘doing’, I
still struggle with the Biblical passages that appear contradictory – two views
that seem mutually exclusive yet we are told are both true. My brain flashed to
a thought puzzle that Einstein had early in his career that led to one of his
most profound theories. I won’t get into too much detail (your welcome), but,
in a nutshell here’s the deal: Einstein tried to imagine what it would look
like if a train was traveling at near the speed of light. The answer has all
kinds of profound implications including how we could travel far into the
future, effects of black holes, and the like. Many of these have since been
experimentally verified and have some really cool ramifications, but that’s for
another time.
For our current topic, I locked onto the impact of relative
viewpoints. You see, the answer to his initial question of what it looked like
is that ‘it depends’. If I’m the one on the train, everything in the train
appears to be going at normal speed. For instance, if I looked at my watch, it
would be ticking every second as normal. But, if I was outside the train
looking in, it would appear that the person inside was essentially frozen in
time. The watch would have effectively stopped. Inside, a second takes a
second, but at the same time that tick of the watch takes hundreds or thousands
of years on the outside. Both viewpoints are true and occurring simultaneously,
yet appear mutually exclusive.
Cool stuff. Ok – cool to some, maybe yawn material for
others - but you don’t have to like, or really even get this to see the
important picture for our problem which is this: the observer impacts the
answer. Turning back to the Biblical examples, when we’re looking at God’s
sovereignty and control over everything, that’s from His viewpoint and it’s
absolutely (and thankfully) true. He sees all things across all of space and
time because He’s bigger than all of that and understands everything He
created. Nothing is puzzling or unaccounted for. But when we’re looking at our
responsibility and choice and freedom to walk away, that’s our viewpoint and
that is also absolutely true. While we can’t see all of time or understand
everything like God does, we have the ability to make choices that are truly
our own and which are incorporated into God’s great plan.
The observer impacts the answer. God was fully in control
when Jonah was being taken by a giant fish to Nineveh. Pharaoh’s hardened heart
was completely used for God’s glory. God has, before time even began, chosen
each member of His eternal family. But also because the observer impacts the
answer, our desire makes a difference in our salvation, Adam and Eve chose to
taste the forbidden fruit, each person has the invitation, but not all have the
inclination to follow the Lord, our choice decides whether we are saved or not.
Because there are two points of observation, at the same time we both make the
decision to follow God and are chosen by God to follow Him. Despite the fact
that these two things seem completely exclusive, they are both true because in
the end, the answer depends on the observer.
And that means that even though God is fully in control and
knows everything that is going to happen, prayer can and does change things and
has a real impact on our world. After all, just because God knows that we are
going to pray to Him and that He’s going to give us what we ask for, it only
actually happens when we accept our responsibility and say that prayer. Praise
God for His awesomeness that we get to be a real and affecting part of His
creation!
By M. McCoubrey
I like the way that C.S. Lewis said it (in regards to prayer) - that prayer changes us. "I pray because I can’t help myself. I pray because I’m helpless. I pray because the need flows out of me all the time, waking and sleeping. It doesn’t change God, it changes me." -CS Lewis
ReplyDeleteGood post!
Mike Taggart
Thanks Mike. I so love C.S. Lewis. He is so good at making complicated stuff seem bafflingly simple. This is the exact kind of thing that is of great comfort having confirmed that prayer is at all effectual. My problem up till now has been that, if prayer was essentially useless compared to God's sovereignty except to accept His sovereignty, then at best it was a means to just submit to His complete rule. While this can be the truth of a situation, it bothered me that God, in truth, wouldn't just say 'deal with it, I get to pick' and instead go through this whole 'let's-pretend-antying-you-say-might-make-a-difference' performance. While that's true from His perspective, it doesn't jive with the focus on prayer as a medium of intersession with God's will. He says that we can change the outcome and that seems to be more than just changing my acceptance, but really affecting the world. Thanks again for the input. Anytime you add Lewis, you add depth to the conversation. :)
DeleteHey Mike,
ReplyDeleteI like a lot of your illustrations. The Einstein one I found to be particularly helpful in this discussion. I do believe that God's sovereignty my look different based on the observer. Sometimes the argument doesn't seems so much an argument, but two different sides to the same coin.
One thing that may be helpful for you is to look into different theories on freedom. Personally, I think that a compatabalist (I think that's how you spell it) version of freedom helps to sort through some of what seems contradictory. This is the view that you are always going to do what you love most to do. With this view you are free to choose in the sense that nothing outside of yourself is forcing you to make a decision, but you are constrained in the sense that you're going to make the choice that you most desire.
Practically, I see this in those who struggle with addiction. They have the choice not to use drugs, but they get pulled back into drug use because they love to use. It seems like the chain of addiction only gets broken when the addict finds something that they love more then using. I.E. A love for family has helped many to break the cycle of addiction because they see the destruction of the thing their first love, their family, by the drug use.
Theologically, I also think it makes sense of passages such as Matthew 7:17, "Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but bad tree bears bad fruit." Until good radically changes our heart we are in love with bad things and so that is what our heart continues to produce. When we are born again this is changed so that our heart desires godly things and therefore produces good fruit.
It greatly excites me to see the theological work that is going on in your mind. Keep up the good work.